<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for A Rose by Any Other Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Words, Words, Words</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on On Your Shoulder by Joel Griffith</title>
		<link>http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/on-your-shoulder/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/?p=126#comment-197</guid>
		<description>That's hysterical! I love Mary Katherine Ham. She was on O'Reilly last night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s hysterical! I love Mary Katherine Ham. She was on O&#8217;Reilly last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paula White is a Heretic by Thomas Twitchell</title>
		<link>http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/paula-white-is-a-heretic/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Twitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/?p=96#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Yes he did and not only one but many. This is such a usurpation to claim to be an Only Begotten Son. Jesus said that many would come in his name saying "I am he." Then warned us not to follow them. I guess then that we know those who are not of him by the fact that they do follow them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes he did and not only one but many. This is such a usurpation to claim to be an Only Begotten Son. Jesus said that many would come in his name saying &#8220;I am he.&#8221; Then warned us not to follow them. I guess then that we know those who are not of him by the fact that they do follow them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paula White is a Heretic by global warning</title>
		<link>http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/paula-white-is-a-heretic/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>global warning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 06:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/?p=96#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Didn't Jesus tells us in the last days that there would be false prophets and even the elect would be deceived?  Here she is!!!  And deceiving millions, hook, line and sinker!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Jesus tells us in the last days that there would be false prophets and even the elect would be deceived?  Here she is!!!  And deceiving millions, hook, line and sinker!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fascist Triangle: Obama, Wright, Cone, Ayers, Clinton by kemal</title>
		<link>http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/fascist-triangle-obama-wright-cone-ayers-clinton/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>kemal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 10:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/?p=114#comment-183</guid>
		<description>thanks. super</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks. super</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What You Must Believe To Be Saved by thomastwitchell</title>
		<link>http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/2007/12/10/what-you-must-believe-to-be-saved/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>thomastwitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 13:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/2007/12/10/what-you-must-believe-to-be-saved/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Hi Charles glad you dropped by.

As I said to all in the comments above I reject an implicit faith. We are not saved by faith in faith, or faith in doctrine, but by grace given on the account of Christ's finished work. John the Baptist and others as well, Scripture indicates, wereregenerated in the womb. There is only one answer and it is according to what Jesus said to Nicodemus; this is a work of the Spirit and as he told the Jews, the flesh counts for nothing, the Spirit is everything.

My premise has to do with certain knowledge. And by certain I mean that which both informs and forms our faith. Nathan above mentioned the explicit knowledge of depravity. If one claims to have faith but has no knowledge of this it is doubtful that they have faith. Now, the knowledge itself may be unclear, but the first thing that we know is our desparate need for a savior. Then, we need knowledge of who that savior is.

People speak of fundamentals or essentials. I do not. I believe the entirety of the Revelation of Jesus Christ to be fundamentally essential. So, what I am saying is that a person will have certain, sure, absolute though perhaps not exhaustive knowledge of some things otherwise upon what foundation is their faith built.

To address your implied question, we need to know something of our absolute depravity. We must first fear God.

I think so too, that we simplify the mysteries out of existence by saying that they are either too difficult or unattainable. But, as I said earlier, I doubt that anything that was written is meant to be unexplainable. Peter in addressing this simply said pay attention to Paul, he is difficult but not impossible.

God bless,

tt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Charles glad you dropped by.</p>
<p>As I said to all in the comments above I reject an implicit faith. We are not saved by faith in faith, or faith in doctrine, but by grace given on the account of Christ&#8217;s finished work. John the Baptist and others as well, Scripture indicates, wereregenerated in the womb. There is only one answer and it is according to what Jesus said to Nicodemus; this is a work of the Spirit and as he told the Jews, the flesh counts for nothing, the Spirit is everything.</p>
<p>My premise has to do with certain knowledge. And by certain I mean that which both informs and forms our faith. Nathan above mentioned the explicit knowledge of depravity. If one claims to have faith but has no knowledge of this it is doubtful that they have faith. Now, the knowledge itself may be unclear, but the first thing that we know is our desparate need for a savior. Then, we need knowledge of who that savior is.</p>
<p>People speak of fundamentals or essentials. I do not. I believe the entirety of the Revelation of Jesus Christ to be fundamentally essential. So, what I am saying is that a person will have certain, sure, absolute though perhaps not exhaustive knowledge of some things otherwise upon what foundation is their faith built.</p>
<p>To address your implied question, we need to know something of our absolute depravity. We must first fear God.</p>
<p>I think so too, that we simplify the mysteries out of existence by saying that they are either too difficult or unattainable. But, as I said earlier, I doubt that anything that was written is meant to be unexplainable. Peter in addressing this simply said pay attention to Paul, he is difficult but not impossible.</p>
<p>God bless,</p>
<p>tt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What You Must Believe To Be Saved by Charles Busada</title>
		<link>http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/2007/12/10/what-you-must-believe-to-be-saved/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Busada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 23:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/2007/12/10/what-you-must-believe-to-be-saved/#comment-181</guid>
		<description>I have enjoyed the post. There is one law in logic, and that is that whenever an absolute is given, it can be refuted by only one example to the contrary. I would think that John the Baptist leaping for joy in his mother's womb at the coming of Mary would qualify for the lone exception needed. When we think of salvation as the telos, and not the means to the telos, we may possibly get off track. I often wonder how much of our depravity we need to know (did they know of this in Athens (Acts 17) and how much crisis do we need to be saved (plenty for the jailer in Philippi, but little, it seems for Lydia (Acts 16).

I wonder if in our desire to simply mysteries, we tend to make over simplifications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have enjoyed the post. There is one law in logic, and that is that whenever an absolute is given, it can be refuted by only one example to the contrary. I would think that John the Baptist leaping for joy in his mother&#8217;s womb at the coming of Mary would qualify for the lone exception needed. When we think of salvation as the telos, and not the means to the telos, we may possibly get off track. I often wonder how much of our depravity we need to know (did they know of this in Athens (Acts 17) and how much crisis do we need to be saved (plenty for the jailer in Philippi, but little, it seems for Lydia (Acts 16).</p>
<p>I wonder if in our desire to simply mysteries, we tend to make over simplifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Free Is God by Thomas Twitchell</title>
		<link>http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/how-free-is-god/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Twitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-170</guid>
		<description>I am so honored, Doulos. By any other name, Reformed, Calvinisit, Biblicist, it would still smell as sweet. I would even go with Doulosian. Ya gotta be a slave to someone, right?

I was thinking when I heard today of Christ pronouncing his disciples friends. What that means is that he has condescended to be one with us and make known his mysteries. It means also, that he has chosen to make us one in his servanthood. Wow, a king who would be servant and friend of sinners. What a way the Father has made to glorify his sons.

Gordan- We are continuing a study of discipleship at church which right now is predicated on the life of Moses. One of the things that came up is what it must have been like each time Moses was granted a hearing by the Pharaoh. Moses had his resume' to look back on and a history of God's dealing with his people. It is only a guess, but the Scripture comes to mind, "Work out your salvation with fear and trembling..." That is awesome. Who knows if God will bring blessing, Peter at Pentecost, or calamity, Stephen's stoning. Same sermon different result... yet both saw the consolation of the Lord.

Woe is me, I am undone...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so honored, Doulos. By any other name, Reformed, Calvinisit, Biblicist, it would still smell as sweet. I would even go with Doulosian. Ya gotta be a slave to someone, right?</p>
<p>I was thinking when I heard today of Christ pronouncing his disciples friends. What that means is that he has condescended to be one with us and make known his mysteries. It means also, that he has chosen to make us one in his servanthood. Wow, a king who would be servant and friend of sinners. What a way the Father has made to glorify his sons.</p>
<p>Gordan- We are continuing a study of discipleship at church which right now is predicated on the life of Moses. One of the things that came up is what it must have been like each time Moses was granted a hearing by the Pharaoh. Moses had his resume&#8217; to look back on and a history of God&#8217;s dealing with his people. It is only a guess, but the Scripture comes to mind, &#8220;Work out your salvation with fear and trembling&#8230;&#8221; That is awesome. Who knows if God will bring blessing, Peter at Pentecost, or calamity, Stephen&#8217;s stoning. Same sermon different result&#8230; yet both saw the consolation of the Lord.</p>
<p>Woe is me, I am undone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Free Is God by The Doulos</title>
		<link>http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/how-free-is-god/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>The Doulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Hard truths, but truths nonetheless. Well thought through as always, sir Twitchell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard truths, but truths nonetheless. Well thought through as always, sir Twitchell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Free Is God by Gordan</title>
		<link>http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/how-free-is-god/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Nice icon, Dr. Honeydew.

I appreciate the willingness of your article here to tackle the tough questions in a head-on manner. I agree with your conclusions.

Funny how there are times when the notion of a sovereign God can be so comforting, and other times when the same notion can make us squirm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice icon, Dr. Honeydew.</p>
<p>I appreciate the willingness of your article here to tackle the tough questions in a head-on manner. I agree with your conclusions.</p>
<p>Funny how there are times when the notion of a sovereign God can be so comforting, and other times when the same notion can make us squirm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Free Is God by Thomas Twitchell</title>
		<link>http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/how-free-is-god/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Twitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 23:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomastwitchell.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-167</guid>
		<description>There are others on th internet! Hallelujah!

Thanks for visiting Todd. Sorry there is notning new, I have been busy elsewhere.

May God richly bless you.

tt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are others on th internet! Hallelujah!</p>
<p>Thanks for visiting Todd. Sorry there is notning new, I have been busy elsewhere.</p>
<p>May God richly bless you.</p>
<p>tt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
